Comments on: Apple patents CSS transform and animation

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:23:07 +0000

not sure what apples intent is, and i agree this should be done with javascript. and like the previous commenter suggests, now that we know it can be done, hackers are bound to come up with an alternate way of doing this with javascript.

By: Abdulhakim Seran

Abdulhakim Seran — Sun, 15 May 2011 11:18:44 +0000

I see all apple geniuses are total idiots.
Are they trying to get attention of other hackers to screw them or what.
Idıots

By: ghettocooler.net » awesomeness

ghettocooler.net » awesomeness — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:35:13 +0000

[...] This will certainly garner the attention of big tech media in the near future. For now it’s low on the radar. | View an example of CSS animation and CSS transforms in a recent build of Google Chrome or [...]

By: Cedric Dugas

Cedric Dugas — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:05:24 +0000

@Syrion I mostly agree with you,

Like I said I can see a utility for animation on hover effect. You can already move let’s say a left property with :hover, but this could add a nice transition without the need of javascript

By: Syrion

Syrion — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:01:07 +0000

I don’t mind it… if those would be selected for CSS 3: why not condone marquee, blink or inverting site-colours in rapid succession?

CSS should stick to basic styling in my opinion,

By: Steven Fisher

Steven Fisher — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:56:54 +0000

Frightening? No. Troubling, maybe.

Could be they’re just tired of getting slapped by stupid patent trolls years later.

Better to wait and see what they plan to do with it.

By: Apple patenta las transformaciones y animaciones con CSS « In Nomine Pixel

Apple patenta las transformaciones y animaciones con CSS « In Nomine Pixel — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:06:12 +0000

[...] Apple patents CSS transformand animation | La patente en cuestión Categorías:CSS Etiquetas:apple, patente Comentarios (0) [...]

By: Patrick

Patrick — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:56:26 +0000

It is definitely a bold move, but practical? It’s also extremely egotistical for being the creators of a mediocre browser.

I’d put 10 bucks on it having to do with Safari for the iPhone/iPod touch.

Patrick Lyver
Kleurvision Inc.