Comments on: Demystifying jQuery .live() and why it’s generally faster than .bind()

By: Compiler

Compiler — Fri, 20 May 2011 06:01:44 +0000

Hi,

To solve the speed problem simply use the focus even instead of the click event.

$(“#datepicker”).live(“focus”, function(){
$(this).datepicker({ changeMonth: true, changeYear: true });
});

By: Binoy

Binoy — Sat, 15 May 2010 09:35:57 +0000

hi, can i use jQuery with telerik RadAjaxPanel

By: nanat

nanat — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:52:50 +0000

i test it in google crome it runs fast.. while i can in firefox the speed is so slow..

By: nanat

nanat — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:37:21 +0000

i have 5 edit menu base on my query when on click edit 1 it consist on of 6 user info, inside my user info i have a plugin called date picker. even if use .live() function it time 10s to appear my date picker.. can u give any suggestion what would i do? tnx

$(“#datepicker”).live(“click”, function(){
$(this).datepicker({ changeMonth: true, changeYear: true });
});

By: What I Read This Week (jQuery’s live(), algorithms, IE8 + VPN, Chrome ) » HTML + CSS + JavaScript » Blog Archive

Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:02:21 +0000

[...] Demystifying jQuery .live() and why it’s generally faster than .bind() [...]

By: links for 2009-12-07 « toonz

links for 2009-12-07 « toonz — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:07:35 +0000

[...] Demystifying jQuery .live() and why it’s generally faster than .bind() « Position Absolute, resou… (tags: jquery tips) [...]

By: Cedric Dugas

Cedric Dugas — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:58:21 +0000

Well using google frame would not give an actual representation of load time on IE, they rarely use Google frame.

By: Hugo

Hugo — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:15:54 +0000

You said “It is however impossible to test this in IE because it happens generally in 1 ms”, you can test it with Google Chrome Frame wich adds the Chrome functionalities to Internet Explorer or any browser.